** We encourage you to share this with your female colleagues.** USLAW NETWORK announces the… Continue Reading
Complex Tort and Product Liability
The USLAW NETWORK Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group is a nationwide network of experienced attorneys committed to providing the highest quality legal services to effectively and efficiently achieve the goals of the clients we serve. We share a commitment to integrity and professionalism and are dedicated to finding creative and cost-effective solutions to the full range of product liability and complex tort exposures, including toxic and mass tort, class actions and claims under consumer protection statutes, so that the results we achieve exceed the expectations of our clients.
Why Choose USLAW Complex Tort and Product Liability Law Firms?
The lawyers within the Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group are specialists and include leaders in our field who have lectured and written extensively on cutting-edge topics and litigation techniques. We provide a full range of litigation and counseling services related to the entire spectrum of product liability and complex tort issues, from traditional exposures to emerging trends, and from single lawsuits to multi-jurisdiction litigation. Often, these matters involve catastrophic injuries or property damage.
Our attorneys have successfully represented clients in thousands of product liability matters across the country and throughout the world. In addition to our vast experience with product liability trials and litigation, we advise our clients on matters relating to pre-litigation planning, litigation management, liability exposure, risk management, risk avoidance and risk transference. This can include working with clients on recall and/or retrofit campaigns, warning labels, operator manuals, disclaimers, indemnity agreements and insurance coverage issues. Utilizing the USLAW Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group provides clients with nationwide access to highly experienced liability attorneys who share information and resources for the benefit of their clients. When you retain a USLAW Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group attorney, you are assured the highest level of quality representation whatever, and wherever, your needs may be. Through seminars, meetings and virtual networking, the members of this practice group communicate with one another to stay abreast of technological advances and changes of law in all areas relating to product liability.
We are trial lawyers, not just litigators. Our attorneys are skilled at early case evaluation and are dedicated to finding creative and cost-effective solutions to complex issues and looking for alternative methods for dispute resolution when appropriate. We represent regionally, nationally and internationally based manufacturers, distributors and retailers of all sizes. Clients from around the world rely upon us to get the job done.
Areas of Practice
Our lawyers defend products of every sort, from consumer goods and automobiles to industrial machinery and high-tech medical devices and everything in between. In addition, USLAW Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group attorneys have represented clients in every major mass product liability and toxic tort litigation since the inception of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, including asbestos, silica, breast implant, Dalkon Shield, Pedicle Screw, Fen/Phen, Redux and latex glove litigation, to name a few. Products defended by our members include:
- Agricultural Equipment
- Alcohol and Distilled Spirits
- Aircraft (Private and Commercial)
- Asbestos
- Automobiles
- Beverage Containers
- Boats and Ships (Commercial and Pleasure)
- Breast Implants
- Building and Construction Equipment
- Chemicals, Solvents and Plastics
- Construction, Products, Vehicles and Equipment
- Consumer Products, Appliances, Equipment and Goods
- Cosmetics
- Electrical Equipment and Devices
- Electrical Wire and Cable
- Firearms
- Fire Sprinklers and Fire Protection Devices
- Flooring Systems
- Food Products
- Furniture
- Hand Tools
- Herbicides and Pesticides
- Industrial Machinery
- Ladders
- Lawn Movers and Outdoor Power Equipment
- Lifting Equipment
- Locomotives and Locomotive Equipment
- Medical Devices and Supplies
- Mining Equipment
- Motorcycles and Recreational Vehicles
- Pharmaceuticals, Prescription Drugs and Over-the-Counter Medications
- Power Tools
- Recreational Equipment
- Respiratory Protective Equipment and Safety Devices
- Roofing Systems
- Scaffolding
- Swimming Pools
- Tanks and Containers
- Tires
- Toys and Children’s Products
- Tobacco Products
- Trucks and Commercial Transportation
- Windows
LEADERSHIP
Jack J. Laffey
United States
Stephen J. Marshall
United States
Nicholas A. Rauch
United States
COMPLEX TORT AND PRODUCT LIABILITY PRACTICE GROUP CLIENT ADVISORS
Amy E. Neff (Blankenship)
United States
Matthew Cairns
United States
Jessica C. Casey
United States
David Gordon
United States
Suzanne G. Meredith
United States
Laura B. Mongioi
United States
Gregory J. Mulligan
United States
Brian P. O’Laughlin
United States
Troy R. Olsen
United States
Jurgen Suuck
United States
RELATED RESOURCES
USLAW Remote: Learn | Navigating Tariffs and Supply Chain Challenges
Intended for the construction and manufacturing industries, tune into this webinar devoted to strategies on how to adapt and thrive in today’s complex supply chain environment, including suggestions to mitigate tariff impacts, manage supply chain volatility, and maintain profitability in an uncertain landscape. Facilitators Caryn A. Boisen, Larson King, LLP… Continue Reading
New leadership | Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group
We are pleased to announce a leadership update for the USLAW NETWORK Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group. Jack J. Laffey of Laffey, Leitner & Goode LLC in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, takes over as Chair of the group. Stephen J. Marshall of Franklin & Prokopik, P.C. in Baltimore, Maryland, is the vice chair, and Nicholas A.… Continue Reading
Available now: 2024 USLAW NETWORK State Judicial Profiles by County
USLAW NETWORK has released the 2024 edition of its state judicial profiles by county, a 50-state report that offers a judicial profile of each county in the U.S. and identifies counties as conservative, moderate or liberal. The profiles also include key recent court decisions that have changed the legal landscape… Continue Reading
Client advisors named to USLAW Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group
USLAW NETWORK names 10 corporate executives and risk management leaders to serve as USLAW NETWORK Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group Client Advisors. As client advisors, they will collaborate alongside the leadership of the practice group to provide valuable input and share insights, experiences and perspectives about the latest… Continue Reading
Williams Kastner’s Rodney Umberger, Eddy Silverman obtain defense verdict in $50 million premises liability trial
Williams Kastner attorneys Rodney L. Umberger and Eddy Silverman, with the help of Seattle paralegal Tristan Pirak, recently obtained a defense verdict in a $50 million premises liability/product liability case following a three-week in-person trial in King County, Washington, with Superior Court Judge Chad Allred presiding. The case, Strout v. Walmart, arose out… Continue Reading
Leadership announced for USLAW Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group
We are pleased to announce the 2022-23 leadership for the USLAW NETWORK Complex Tort and Product Liability Practice Group. For more information about this practice group or attorneys in this group, click here. Continue Reading
Kunsch earns unanimous defense verdict in product liability case
On July 15, 2022, Sweeney & Sheehan Partner Michael Kunsch won a unanimous defense verdict in a product liability case following a 4-day jury trial in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff sustained injuries after falling from a steel rolling tower scaffold in the course of his employment as… Continue Reading
Six years of litigation results in dismissal with prejudice for Murchison & Cumming’s client
After six years of litigation and a week in trial, a dismissal with prejudice was entered for defendant Louisville Ladder Company due to impeachment evidence against plaintiff Richard Skinner. Friedrich W. Seitz and Kelsey L. Maxwell represented the defendant. The case began on May 6, 2016, when the plaintiff sued Louisville Ladder Company because… Continue Reading
Fourth Circuit affirms District Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment to Six Flags confirming there was no negligence in the operation of a water slide
A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland’s grant of summary judgment to Six Flags. Six Flags had been sued by a guest of its Maryland waterpark who alleged negligence in the operation of… Continue Reading
Traub Lieberman Team Obtains Motion to Dismiss in Second Third-Party Complaint
Traub Lieberman attorneys Lisa M. Rolle and Erin O’Dea obtained a motion to dismiss in favor of a wall systems installation company (“Installer”) in a second third-party complaint brought before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. In the underlying suit, the plaintiff alleged she… Continue Reading
Josh Evett successfully defended a medical device manufacturer before the Idaho Supreme Court on appeal
Josh Evett of Duke Evett PLLC successfully defended a medical device manufacturer before the Idaho Supreme Court on appeal. This result ends the lawsuit successfully in favor of Duke Evett’s client. The case involved allegedly defective electrical stimulation pads that burned the plaintiff during physical therapy. Because the plaintiff could not… Continue Reading
Traub Lieberman Partner Lisa M. Rolle obtained summary judgment in favor of defendant, a family-owned and operated fire sprinkler company
Traub Lieberman Partner Lisa M. Rolle obtained summary judgment in favor of defendant SRI Fire Sprinkler, LLC, a family-owned and operated fire sprinkler company. The judgment was determined pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) on the grounds that Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company’s (Plaintiff) negligent construction claim accrued on the date when work was… Continue Reading